Skip to main content

Corporate excess: Who cares about CEO pay?

The Business Secretary, Greg Clarke has announced a series of corporate governance reforms, including a requirement for companies to publish the pay ratio which measures the pay of the CEO relative to the salary of their average UK employee. The aim of the reforms is to make companies more accountable to their employees and shareholders.

ICMA Feature

The big question is: do employees and shareholders care?

Research on American companies suggests that employees don’t care, at least not in the way we might think. Faleye et al (2013) show that productivity is not affected by high pay ratios, except that is in companies with fewer employees. Interestingly, in these companies a high ratio spurs employees to greater efforts and productivity improves. Higher pay ratios are also good news for shareholders, because company value increases with the pay ratio.

So is anyone apart from the government and media, upset by high pay ratios?

The answer may be consumers. Unpublished research by Mohan et al (2015) shows that in experiments where consumers were told about relative pay, they were willing to pay higher prices for the same product if it was sold by a company with a lower pay ratio. In other words they wanted to punish firms that paid their CEOs “too much”.

If consumers are motivated to seek out the new data (a big “if”) and use it in their buying decisions this could affect profitability and company values, at which point shareholders and CEOs will have to become far more concerned about relative pay in British companies.

References:

Published 30 August 2017

You might also like

ICMA Centre gains SII Centre of Excellence designation

10 March 2008

The LIBOR/ TIBOR ‘Scandal’

12 February 2013
The large fine imposed on RBS last week suggests that a ‘scandal’ took place in the banking world over the setting of LIBOR. Yes – there was probably systematic mis-pricing of LIBOR which enabled some traders and some banks to profit at the expense of others. But the LIBOR issue simply highlights a much wider problem in financial markets which is that many ‘prices’ quoted in markets are not market prices at all. Instead they are prices based on computer models, matrix pricing or sheer guesswork, which may or may not produce ‘accurate’ prices. The reason for using computers models and guesswork is that in many financial products there actually are no transactions at all or very few even over periods of some weeks or months and thus no market prices.

Congratulations on your A level results!

21 August 2013